Crown Records was a budget label for the Bihari Brothers, who ran the Modern and RPM labels. Crown started in December, 1953, with four
artist signings (including Joe Houston), as the Bihari Brothers' R&B label, but they didn't release albums
on Crown until 1957. In March, 1957, Saul Bihari announced that Modern and RPM albums would be
discontinued and reissued on the Crown label at $1.98 per album. Later in the year, the price dropped to
$1.49 per album to compete with budget labels like Tops, and the next year stereo albums on red vinyl
were introduced, priced at $2.98 (Tops' Mayfair subsidiary was issuing stereo records on yellow vinyl.) A
year later, in March, 1958, Bihari would announce that all Modern and RPM singles would also be
discontinued in favor of a new singles label, Kent. As a label, Crown has a mixed reputation. Many of
their albums contain early rock and roll or jazz and are sought after by collectors. On the other hand,
Crown put out a lot of schmaltz, knockoffs, and otherwise forgettable music, all packaged in cheap
covers, giving Crown the "other" reputation as the King of junk labels.
Crown albums started out by reissuing the material from Modern and RPM, which was often excellent
and sought-after. After running out of Modern and RPM reissues, Crown soon settled down to become
another of the low-budget labels putting out generic music, knockoffs of current hits, or deceptive artist
names meant to confuse the undiscerning buyer, much like Tops or Pickwick's labels. And Crown
became one of the earliest labels to start hawking music with a famous artist's name in huge letters, but
the music inside was by "members" of their former orchestra. Later labels like K-tel or Gusto learned
from the Biharis, re-recording hundreds of former rock/pop hits by "one or more members of the original
group." They also learned from the Biharis that avoiding royalties was a good thing if you wanted to
make money, so they offered their artists a flat fee for recording (see below).
As the Bihari budget label, Crown quickly earned itself a reputation as a junk record label, and by
sheer volume of issues and reissues became known as the King of junk record labels (yeah, they even
have a crown...). Cost savings measures (= "cutting corners") were obvious everywhere. The covers
were cheaply made, and fell apart almost instantly. The back slicks were the only thing that held the two
slabs of cover cardboard together, and the paper didn't last long; finding a Crown album today without a
seam split is indeed unusual. The back and front slicks themselves were often recycled unused slicks
from old records; on many you can see the pictures from old front covers right through the paper. The
front slicks were put on by hand, no doubt using unskilled (or uncaring) labor, as rarely were they put on
straight (or maybe once in a while fortuitously put on straight).
The records themselves often sounded worn out right out of the package, with all kinds of bumps and
wrinkles or other vinyl anomalies. The preference for material for release was public domain tunes so no
royalties need be paid (check how many times the song "Ida" shows up - scores of times. How many
other labels have that song?). Other songs were purchased outright for a few bucks from the artists
used for recording, who were paid a flat fee for recording, with no possibilities of future royalties. Songs
were recycled, too, with generic artists' names rotated so the same recordings could be used again and
again under different names. Some masters were even "traded out" to other budget labels, who
renamed the artists and provided Crown in turn with their generic recordings that Crown could
name for themselves. For this reason, the same recordings would show up on several labels under
several different artists' credits, and even under different song names (see the discussions under
CLP-5055 and CLP-5174 for just two examples of this practice).
Crown was much too cheap to issue special promotional copies; in fact, it's doubtful they ever gave
away promotional copies, with special labels or not.
An interesting aspect of the Crown albums was the artwork, especially the "Fazzio" covers, which were
airbrushed photos that resembled oil paintings. These started after Crown has experimented with
drawings of the artists (5278-5308). The first Fazzio cover was 5321 in mid-1963, and they continued
until 5422 in mid-1964, except for a couple of recycled covers later. Actually, they had several
philosophies as to cover art, and they changed these often. From 5310-5318 in 1963, they had a cover
design that looked for all the world like it was made at World Pacific/Horizon records, and for all we
know, it was. For a time, they tried knockoffs of other (charting) album covers to confuse potential
customers who weren't too observant (e.g., 5150, which was a knockoff of the 101 Strings album The
Soul of Spain, which had a similar but yellow cover, 5217 which was a Kingston Trio knockoff, and
5233, which was a Marty Robbins knockoff).
Like most budget labels, there was plenty of cheesecake photos on covers, but most were tasteful and
avoided the records being rejected by record shops or grocery stores. About as far as Crown went
pushing the envelope was the cover of 5046, which featured a nude model in a hammock for the album
I'm in the Nude for Love.
When Crown went to their last logo (the three-pointed crown in mid-1964) at about 5430, the covers for
Crown (and other Bihari labels like Custom) switched to a series of generic photos, mostly of pretty
women or anonymous cowboys with their hats pulled low or photographed from the back or in silhouette.
And after this point, Crown was determined to gave a new meaning to the term "album filler." Most
albums after that point included one re-made hit song or so, and eight or nine catalog songs from the
Bihari's library. How many times do we need to hear "Wait Till the Sun Shines Nellie" or "Little Brown
Jug"? And of course, many of these albums were outright reissues of earlier offerings, sometimes with
the same artists' names and other times not.
Even though Crown changed logos on their album covers to the three-pointed crown in mid-1964, they
didn't change the label to match the logo until the end of 1969, probably to use up all the existing label
blanks. Crown Records' last issues were in 1972.
The first Crown label (far left) was black with silver print, with "crown" in lower case letters bending around the top edge of the label. Early labels had the address on Washington Street at the bottom with a small three-pointed crown; reissues changed the address to just "Culver City, Calif." The one nod to class was that early stereo albums before the end of 1960 (approximately 5197/217) were issued on red vinyl. These had a slightly different black label design (near left), with a drawing of a crown. | ||
In early 1961, the label design changed to a black label with multi-color letters in the block CROWN logo. Mono labels (far left) and stereo labels (near left) were similar except for a large red "STEREO" around the bottom of the stereo version. By the time this label was installed, at approximately 5207/224, the red vinyl stereo releases had been discontinued, but Crown released one more red vinyl stereo record, The Hawk Swings (Crown 5207/224), which was probably the last red vinyl album Crown put out. This label lasted only for about a year, to somewhere between 5250 and 5260, in early 1962. | ||
In early 1962, Crown switched to a one-ink label design with black print on a grey background. This label, or variations of it, lasted until the end of the label. The design was sparse, with block letters CROWN at the top (far left). Stereo designations first were with large letters around the bottom of the label (near left). | ||
By the mid-1960s, there was a minor change in the design of the stereo grey label (far left), with the "STEREO" designation at the bottom being replaced by a small "STEREO" to the right of the center hole. At the very end of 1969, Crown went to a label (near left) that matched the three-point crown logo that started in 1964 at about #5430/430, over five years after that logo came into use! (They must have had quite a stockpile of old label blanks in 1964.) |